The druid mastery deals with any "direct" heal. Well, shouldn't the Lifebloom "bloom" effect be counted as a direct heal? If for no other reason than the fact that Regrowth's initial heal counts. Essentially, Lifebloom is just a backwards form of Regrowth.
Just wondering if tis was done on purpose or perhaps just overlooked.
Cheers,
Moofaza
Edit: If this is in the wrong forum i'm quite sorry. please redirect me
Anybody know?
Regrowth is a direct heal with a heal over time component.
Lifebloom is a heal over time spell with a direct heal component.
The two spells reverse their core and secondary componenents. In both cases, their interaction with Mastery is dictated by their core component.
Regrowth always benefits from Mastery because its core component is a direct heal.
Lifebloom benefits from Mastery when it is cast/refreshed under the influence of Harmony because its core component is a heal over time.
The new, current Mastery is amazing. Casting Nourish once increases your TOTAL healing done by X% ? -- C'mon. That was really nice of Blizzard to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment